Comparison

Moules De Corde Bio vs Moules de corde

Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoules De Corde BioMoules de corde
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — —
Calories 50 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 1 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.5 g 1 g
Protein 10 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensMolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moules De Corde Bio has 60% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 125 kcal).
  • Moules De Corde Bio has 67% less fat (1 g vs 3 g).
  • Moules De Corde Bio has 43% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Moules de corde has 35% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Moules de corde has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
  • Moules de corde has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Moules De Corde Bio lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Moules De Corde Bio

Moules non triploïdes (mytilus edulis) bio d'irlande

Moules de corde

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moules De Corde Bio or Moules de corde?

Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moules De Corde Bio has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules De Corde Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons