Comparison

Moules De Corde Bio vs Moules de corde

Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoules De Corde BioMoules de corde
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — —
Calories 50 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 1 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.5 g 0.4 g
Protein 10 g 17.2 g
Additives00
AllergensMolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moules De Corde Bio has 51% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Moules de corde has 73% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Moules de corde has 42% more protein (17.2 g vs 10 g).
  • Moules de corde has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Moules De Corde Bio lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Moules De Corde Bio

Moules non triploïdes (mytilus edulis) bio d'irlande

Moules de corde

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moules De Corde Bio or Moules de corde?

Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moules De Corde Bio has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules De Corde Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons