Monster munch giants vs Tiras de maíz
Overall, Monster munch giants has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster munch giants | Tiras de maíz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 505 kcal | 548 kcal |
| Fat | 25.2 g | 33.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster munch giants has 25% less fat (25.2 g vs 33.4 g).
- Monster munch giants has 30% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3 g).
- Tiras de maíz has 80% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3 g).
- Tiras de maíz has 49% more fiber (4.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Monster munch giants has 21% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.4 g).
- Only Monster munch giants lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Monster munch giants
maize, rapeseed oil, roast beef seasoning [wheat flour (contains calcium, iron, niacin, thiamin), hydrolysed soya protein, whey permeate (from milk), flavourings, rusk (from whe sugar, flavour enhancers (monosodium glutamate disodium 5'-ribonucleotides), onion powder, salt, garlic powder, colour (ammonia caramel), spice allergy advice contains: see highlighted ingredients may contain: gluten, barley, celery, mustard monsters are here forever this snack is best befor
Tiras de maíz
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster munch giants or Tiras de maíz?
Overall, Monster munch giants has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster munch giants has fewer calories: 505 kcal versus 548 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tiras de maíz has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3 g per 100 g.