Monster money vs Wacky Sticks
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster money | Wacky Sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster money has 75% less fat (0.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Monster money has 86% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Monster money has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 57 g).
- Monster money has 87% more protein (9 g vs 1.2 g).
- Monster money has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Monster money lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Monster money
Weizenmehl, Stärke, färbendes Lebensmittel: Rote-Bete-Saft-Konzentrat, Aromen, Süßungsmittel: Acesulfam-K, Saccharin; Farbstoff: Indigotin, Kurkumin.
Wacky Sticks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster money or Wacky Sticks?
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster money has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster money has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 57 g per 100 g.