Monster money vs Himbeerschnüre
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster money | Himbeerschnüre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 69 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster money has 44% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Monster money has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 69 g).
- Monster money has 97% more protein (9 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Monster money
Weizenmehl, Stärke, färbendes Lebensmittel: Rote-Bete-Saft-Konzentrat, Aromen, Süßungsmittel: Acesulfam-K, Saccharin; Farbstoff: Indigotin, Kurkumin.
Himbeerschnüre
Zucker, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Maisstärke, Invertzuckersirup, 7% Himbeersaft aus Himbeersaftkonzentrat, Weizenstärke, Weizenmehl, Säuerungsmittel: Äpfelsäure, Citronensäure; Feuchthaltemittel: Glycerin; Palmfett, Kartoffelstärke, 0,5% Johannisbeersaft aus Johannisbeersaft-konzentrat, natürliches Aroma,Säureregulator: Kaliumcitrate; Färbvende Frucht-und Pflanzenkonzentrate: Hibiskus, Karotte; Kochsalz. 400
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster money or Himbeerschnüre?
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster money has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster money has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 69 g per 100 g.