Monster money vs Catdinal
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster money | Catdinal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 56.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | — |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster money has 10% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Monster money has 87% less fat (0.9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Monster money has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 56.7 g).
- Only Monster money lists: Gluten.
- Only Catdinal lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Monster money
Weizenmehl, Stärke, färbendes Lebensmittel: Rote-Bete-Saft-Konzentrat, Aromen, Süßungsmittel: Acesulfam-K, Saccharin; Farbstoff: Indigotin, Kurkumin.
Catdinal
Zucker, Glucosesirup, Wasser, Schokolade 18% (Kakaomasse min. 43%, Soja, Aromen, Zitronensäure, Agar
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster money or Catdinal?
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster money has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster money has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 56.7 g per 100 g.