Comparison
Schoko Brezeln vs Catdinal
Overall, Catdinal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schoko Brezeln | Catdinal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 478 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | — |
| Sugars | 31 g | 56.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | — |
| Protein | 8.8 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Catdinal has 16% fewer calories (400 kcal vs 478 kcal).
- Catdinal has 68% less fat (6.7 g vs 21 g).
- Schoko Brezeln has 45% less sugar (31 g vs 56.7 g).
- Only Catdinal lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Schoko Brezeln
Not available.
Catdinal
Zucker, Glucosesirup, Wasser, Schokolade 18% (Kakaomasse min. 43%, Soja, Aromen, Zitronensäure, Agar
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schoko Brezeln or Catdinal?
Overall, Catdinal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Catdinal has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schoko Brezeln has less sugar: 31 g versus 56.7 g per 100 g.