Monster money vs Schoko Brezeln
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster money | Schoko Brezeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 478 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 31 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster money has 25% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 478 kcal).
- Monster money has 96% less fat (0.9 g vs 21 g).
- Monster money has 97% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 11 g).
- Monster money has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 31 g).
- Monster money has 86% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Monster money has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Monster money lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Monster money
Weizenmehl, Stärke, färbendes Lebensmittel: Rote-Bete-Saft-Konzentrat, Aromen, Süßungsmittel: Acesulfam-K, Saccharin; Farbstoff: Indigotin, Kurkumin.
Schoko Brezeln
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster money or Schoko Brezeln?
Overall, Monster money has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster money has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster money has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 31 g per 100 g.