Monster energy vs Red Bull Sugarfree
Overall, Red Bull Sugarfree has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster energy | Red Bull Sugarfree |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 3 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Bull Sugarfree has 94% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Red Bull Sugarfree has no sugar, while Monster energy has 11 g.
- Red Bull Sugarfree has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Monster energy
Sprankelend water, suiker, glucosestroop, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma's, taurine (0.4%), zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraten), ginsengwortelextract (0.08%), L-carnitine L-tartraat (0.04%), conserveermiddelen (sorbinezuur, benzoëzuur), cafeïne (0. 03%), kleurstof (anthocyanen), vitamines (niacine, B6, riboflavine, B12), zoetstof (sucralose), natriumchloride, glucuronolacton, guarana extract (0.002%), inositol, maltodextrin
Red Bull Sugarfree
In moderaten Mengen Nahrwertdeklaration Energie Felt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster energy or Red Bull Sugarfree?
Overall, Red Bull Sugarfree has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Bull Sugarfree has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Bull Sugarfree has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.