Monster energy vs Red Bull Wassermelone
Overall, Red Bull Wassermelone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster energy | Red Bull Wassermelone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Bull Wassermelone has no calories, while Monster energy has 47 kcal.
- Red Bull Wassermelone has 100% less sugar (0 g vs 11 g).
- Red Bull Wassermelone has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Monster energy
Sprankelend water, suiker, glucosestroop, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma's, taurine (0.4%), zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraten), ginsengwortelextract (0.08%), L-carnitine L-tartraat (0.04%), conserveermiddelen (sorbinezuur, benzoëzuur), cafeïne (0. 03%), kleurstof (anthocyanen), vitamines (niacine, B6, riboflavine, B12), zoetstof (sucralose), natriumchloride, glucuronolacton, guarana extract (0.002%), inositol, maltodextrin
Red Bull Wassermelone
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster energy or Red Bull Wassermelone?
Overall, Red Bull Wassermelone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Bull Wassermelone has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Bull Wassermelone has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.