Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80 vs Garnelen
Overall, Garnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/... | Garnelen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garnelen has 22% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Garnelen has 30% less fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Garnelen has 59% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80 has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Only Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80 lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80
Camarão, sal.
Garnelen
White Tiger Garnelen, Wasser*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80 or Garnelen?
Overall, Garnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garnelen has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miolo de Camarão Calibre 60/80 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.