Comparison

Mini Sticks vs White meat chicken tender bites

Overall, White meat chicken tender bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini SticksWhite meat chicken tender bi...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 250 kcal 250 kcal
Fat 14.3 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 5.4 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 21.4 g
Salt 2.3 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 28.6 g 32.1 g
Additives12
AllergensCeleryCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White meat chicken tender bites has 75% less fat (3.6 g vs 14.3 g).
  • White meat chicken tender bites has no saturated fat, while Mini Sticks has 5.4 g.
  • Mini Sticks has no sugar, while White meat chicken tender bites has 21.4 g.
  • White meat chicken tender bites has 31% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • White meat chicken tender bites has 11% more protein (32.1 g vs 28.6 g).
  • White meat chicken tender bites has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mini Sticks is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Mini Sticks

TURKEY, WATER, ENCAPSULATED LACTIC ACID, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF FLAVORS, SALT, GRANULATED GARLIC, CULTURED CELERY EXTRACT, BEEF COLLAGEN CASING

White meat chicken tender bites

white meat chicken, water, brown sugar, sugar, glycerin, sea salt, fructose, flavorings, dehydrated garlic, citric acid, cultured celery extract, natural smoke flavor, maltodextrin, fermented oregano, flaxseed, plum

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini Sticks or White meat chicken tender bites?

Overall, White meat chicken tender bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mini Sticks has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mini Sticks has less sugar: 0 g versus 21.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons