Mini Rochers Noix de Coco vs Congolais
Overall, Congolais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Rochers Noix de Coco | Congolais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 446 kcal | 423 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 39 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.3 g | — |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 4.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Congolais has 25% less sugar (39 g vs 52 g).
Ingredients
Mini Rochers Noix de Coco
Noix de coco 31%, sucre, sirop de glucose, blanc d'_oeuf_, dextrose, farine de riz.
Congolais
Sucre. noix de coco, farine de riz, sucre inverti, blanc d'_œuf_, flocon de pomme de terre. arômes. sirop de glucose.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Rochers Noix de Coco or Congolais?
Overall, Congolais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Congolais has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Congolais has less sugar: 39 g versus 52 g per 100 g.