Comparison

Mini kougelhopf vs Kougelhopfs d'Alsace

Overall, Mini kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini kougelhopfKougelhopfs d'Alsace
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 351 kcal 631 kcal
Fat 9.9 g 50.2 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 43.9 g
Sugars 16 g 37.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 3.9 g
Protein 7.8 g 3.2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mini kougelhopf has 44% fewer calories (351 kcal vs 631 kcal).
  • Mini kougelhopf has 80% less fat (9.9 g vs 50.2 g).
  • Mini kougelhopf has 87% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 43.9 g).
  • Mini kougelhopf has 57% less sugar (16 g vs 37.5 g).
  • Kougelhopfs d'Alsace has 75% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Mini kougelhopf has 59% more protein (7.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Mini kougelhopf has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kougelhopfs d'Alsace lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Mini kougelhopf

Not available.

Kougelhopfs d'Alsace

Matière grasse végétale (Noix de coco, Palmiste), sucre, poudre de cacao maigre, matière grasse végétale hydrogénée (Noix de coco, Palmiste), lactosérum en poudre (_lait_), émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, arôme naturel de vanille

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini kougelhopf or Kougelhopfs d'Alsace?

Overall, Mini kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mini kougelhopf has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mini kougelhopf has less sugar: 16 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons