Kougelhopfs d'Alsace vs Kougelhopf
Overall, Kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kougelhopfs d'Alsace | Kougelhopf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 631 kcal | 376 kcal |
| Fat | 50.2 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 43.9 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 37.5 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kougelhopf has 40% fewer calories (376 kcal vs 631 kcal).
- Kougelhopf has 70% less fat (15 g vs 50.2 g).
- Kougelhopf has 80% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 43.9 g).
- Kougelhopf has 65% less sugar (13 g vs 37.5 g).
- Kougelhopfs d'Alsace has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kougelhopf has 59% more protein (7.8 g vs 3.2 g).
- Kougelhopf has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kougelhopfs d'Alsace lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kougelhopfs d'Alsace
Matière grasse végétale (Noix de coco, Palmiste), sucre, poudre de cacao maigre, matière grasse végétale hydrogénée (Noix de coco, Palmiste), lactosérum en poudre (_lait_), émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, arôme naturel de vanille
Kougelhopf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kougelhopfs d'Alsace or Kougelhopf?
Overall, Kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kougelhopf has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kougelhopf has less sugar: 13 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.