Comparison

Kougelhopf vs Kougelhopfs d'Alsace

Overall, Kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKougelhopfKougelhopfs d'Alsace
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 376 kcal 631 kcal
Fat 15 g 50.2 g
Saturated fat 8.6 g 43.9 g
Sugars 13 g 37.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.3 g
Protein 7.8 g 3.2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kougelhopf has 40% fewer calories (376 kcal vs 631 kcal).
  • Kougelhopf has 70% less fat (15 g vs 50.2 g).
  • Kougelhopf has 80% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 43.9 g).
  • Kougelhopf has 65% less sugar (13 g vs 37.5 g).
  • Kougelhopfs d'Alsace has 59% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Kougelhopf has 59% more protein (7.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Kougelhopf has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kougelhopfs d'Alsace lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Kougelhopf

Not available.

Kougelhopfs d'Alsace

matière grasse végétale (noix de coco, palmis - te), sucre, poudre de cacao fortement dégraissée, matière grasse végétale hydrogénée (noix de coco, palmiste), lactosérum en poudre, émulsifiant: lécithine de soja, arôme: arôme naturel de vanille. Peut contenir des traces d'oeufs, de blé, d'arachides, de sésame et de fruits à coques

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kougelhopf or Kougelhopfs d'Alsace?

Overall, Kougelhopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kougelhopf has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kougelhopf has less sugar: 13 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons