Comparison

Milka vs Aventura Pasas de Uva

Overall, Aventura Pasas de Uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilkaAventura Pasas de Uva
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 509 kcal 349 kcal
Fat 27 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 15 g 6.2 g
Sugars 56 g 72 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.3 g
Fiber 2.7 g 0 g
Protein 6.3 g 7.5 g
Additives22
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aventura Pasas de Uva has 31% fewer calories (349 kcal vs 509 kcal).
  • Aventura Pasas de Uva has 91% less fat (2.5 g vs 27 g).
  • Aventura Pasas de Uva has 58% less saturated fat (6.2 g vs 15 g).
  • Milka has 22% less sugar (56 g vs 72 g).
  • Milka has 100% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Aventura Pasas de Uva has 16% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Only Milka lists: Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Milka

Sugar, cocoa butter, raisins (12%), skimmed milk powder, cocoa mass, whey powder (contains milk), hazelnuts (5%), milk fat, emulsifier (soya lecithin), hazelnut paste, flavouring.

Aventura Pasas de Uva

Azúcar, leche en polvo, manteca de cacao, pasta de cacao, pasas de uva, lecitina de soja, saborizante artificial a vainilla.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milka or Aventura Pasas de Uva?

Overall, Aventura Pasas de Uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aventura Pasas de Uva has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 509 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Milka has less sugar: 56 g versus 72 g per 100 g.

More comparisons