Milk Chocolate Raisins vs Aventura Pasas de Uva
Overall, Aventura Pasas de Uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milk Chocolate Raisins | Aventura Pasas de Uva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 464 kcal | 349 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.5 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 60.7 g | 72 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Peanuts, Sesame seeds | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Aventura Pasas de Uva has 25% fewer calories (349 kcal vs 464 kcal).
- Aventura Pasas de Uva has 90% less fat (2.5 g vs 25 g).
- Aventura Pasas de Uva has 50% less saturated fat (6.2 g vs 12.5 g).
- Milk Chocolate Raisins has 16% less sugar (60.7 g vs 72 g).
- Milk Chocolate Raisins has 100% more fiber (3.6 g vs 0 g).
- Aventura Pasas de Uva has 52% more protein (7.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Milk Chocolate Raisins is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Milk Chocolate Raisins lists: Peanuts, Sesame seeds.
- Only Aventura Pasas de Uva lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Milk Chocolate Raisins
Peanuts, sesame, sugar, flour, salt, corn starch, corn sugar, sesame oil.
Aventura Pasas de Uva
Azúcar, leche en polvo, manteca de cacao, pasta de cacao, pasas de uva, lecitina de soja, saborizante artificial a vainilla.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Raisins or Aventura Pasas de Uva?
Overall, Aventura Pasas de Uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aventura Pasas de Uva has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milk Chocolate Raisins has less sugar: 60.7 g versus 72 g per 100 g.