Milk chocolate raisins vs Milka
Overall, Milk chocolate raisins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milk chocolate raisins | Milka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 467 kcal | 509 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.7 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 60 g | 56 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milk chocolate raisins has 26% less fat (20 g vs 27 g).
- Milk chocolate raisins has 22% less saturated fat (11.7 g vs 15 g).
- Milk chocolate raisins has 19% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Milka has 47% more protein (6.3 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Milka lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Milk chocolate raisins
Not available.
Milka
Sugar, cocoa butter, raisins (12%), skimmed milk powder, cocoa mass, whey powder (contains milk), hazelnuts (5%), milk fat, emulsifier (soya lecithin), hazelnut paste, flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milk chocolate raisins or Milka?
Overall, Milk chocolate raisins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milk chocolate raisins has fewer calories: 467 kcal versus 509 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milka has less sugar: 56 g versus 60 g per 100 g.