Milk compound vs Maruja cracking
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milk compound | Maruja cracking |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 531 kcal | 514 kcal |
| Fat | 30.2 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 23.6 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 57.1 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maruja cracking has 11% less fat (27 g vs 30.2 g).
- Maruja cracking has 11% less sugar (51 g vs 57.1 g).
- Maruja cracking has 27% more protein (6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Only Milk compound lists: Gluten.
- Only Maruja cracking lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Milk compound
Zahăr, grăsime de palmier, cacao cu conținut redus de grăsime, zer praf, 5 % lapte praf degresat, emulsifiant: lecitine (din soia); aromă. Poate contine urme de arahide, fructe cu coajă lemnoasă, ouă, cereale care conțin gluten (grâu, orz).
Maruja cracking
Azúcar, Grasa vegetal de palmiste hidrogenada, Leche en polvo (12.2%), Arroz crujiente (10%), Cacao desgrasado en polvo, suero lácteo en polvo. Emulgente (lectina de soja), aroma (vanila).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milk compound or Maruja cracking?
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maruja cracking has fewer calories: 514 kcal versus 531 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maruja cracking has less sugar: 51 g versus 57.1 g per 100 g.