Milk compound with peanuts vs Maruja cracking
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milk compound with peanuts | Maruja cracking |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 532 kcal | 514 kcal |
| Fat | 31.8 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 51.6 g | 51 g |
| Salt | — | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | — |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maruja cracking has 15% less fat (27 g vs 31.8 g).
- Only Maruja cracking lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Milk compound with peanuts
Not available.
Maruja cracking
Azúcar, Grasa vegetal de palmiste hidrogenada, Leche en polvo (12.2%), Arroz crujiente (10%), Cacao desgrasado en polvo, suero lácteo en polvo. Emulgente (lectina de soja), aroma (vanila).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milk compound with peanuts or Maruja cracking?
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maruja cracking has fewer calories: 514 kcal versus 532 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maruja cracking has less sugar: 51 g versus 51.6 g per 100 g.