Dark vs Maruja cracking
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dark | Maruja cracking |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 551 kcal | 514 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Peanuts | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maruja cracking has 21% less fat (27 g vs 34 g).
- Maruja cracking has 47% more protein (6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Only Dark lists: Nuts, Peanuts.
- Only Maruja cracking lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Dark
Sugar, palm fat, fat reduced cocoa powder, milk fat, emulsifier: lecithins (from soy), nut paste (hazelnuts, peanuts), flavouring. May contain other nuts, eggs and cereals containing gluten.
Maruja cracking
Azúcar, Grasa vegetal de palmiste hidrogenada, Leche en polvo (12.2%), Arroz crujiente (10%), Cacao desgrasado en polvo, suero lácteo en polvo. Emulgente (lectina de soja), aroma (vanila).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dark or Maruja cracking?
Overall, Maruja cracking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maruja cracking has fewer calories: 514 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maruja cracking has less sugar: 51 g versus 52 g per 100 g.