Comparison

Milk Chocolate Raisins vs Marabou Mintkrokant 200g

Overall, Milk Chocolate Raisins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilk Chocolate RaisinsMarabou Mintkrokant 200g
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 475 kcal 544 kcal
Fat 22.5 g 32 g
Saturated fat 12.5 g 18 g
Sugars 60 g 59 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 2.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 5 g 3.9 g
Additives30
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 13% fewer calories (475 kcal vs 544 kcal).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 30% less fat (22.5 g vs 32 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 31% less saturated fat (12.5 g vs 18 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 72% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 36% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 22% more protein (5 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Only Marabou Mintkrokant 200g lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Milk Chocolate Raisins

Milk Chocolate (Sugar, Cocoa Butter, Whole Milk, Chocolate Liquor, Nonfat Milk, Butter Oil, Soy Lecithin, Vanillin, Salt), Raisins, Corn Syrup, Dextrin, Maltodextrin, Confectioner's Glaze.

Marabou Mintkrokant 200g

Socker, kakaosmör, kakaomassa, vasslepulver (MJÖLK), palmolja, _SKUMMJÖLKSPULVER_, _SMÖRFETT_, vassleprodukt (_MJÖLK_), _MANDEL_, sockrad kondenserad _SKUMMJÖLK_, emulgeringsmedel (_SOJALECITINER_), salt, aromer.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Raisins or Marabou Mintkrokant 200g?

Overall, Milk Chocolate Raisins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Milk Chocolate Raisins has fewer calories: 475 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Marabou Mintkrokant 200g has less sugar: 59 g versus 60 g per 100 g.

More comparisons