Comparison

Miettes de thon a la tomate vs Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMiettes de thon a la tomateMiettes thon à la tomate pêc...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 104 kcal 146 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 8 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 2 g
Sugars 4 g 1.8 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0.8 g 1.2 g
Protein 13 g 14 g
Additives20
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Miettes de thon a la tomate has 29% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 146 kcal).
  • Miettes de thon a la tomate has 57% less fat (3.4 g vs 8 g).
  • Miettes de thon a la tomate has 75% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g has 55% less sugar (1.8 g vs 4 g).
  • Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g has 30% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Miettes de thon a la tomate

_Thon_, eau, concentré de tomate (20 %), huile de tournesol, sucre, sel, amidon transformé de maïs, arômes, épaississant : gomme guar,

Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g

THON listao (Katsuwonus pelamis) pêché en Océan Atlantique Centre-Est 65%, eau, concentré de tomates 9,7%, huile de tournesol, sucre, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Miettes de thon a la tomate or Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Miettes de thon a la tomate has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Miettes thon à la tomate pêché ligne boîte, boîte de 160g has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons