Melasse de sucre de canne vs Gember siroop
Overall, Gember siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Melasse de sucre de canne | Gember siroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 235 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 62 g | 57.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gember siroop has 20% fewer calories (235 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Gember siroop has 98% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Gember siroop has no saturated fat, while Melasse de sucre de canne has 0.5 g.
- Melasse de sucre de canne has 93% more protein (2.7 g vs 0.2 g).
- Only Melasse de sucre de canne lists: None.
Ingredients
Melasse de sucre de canne
Mélasse
Gember siroop
Suiker, water, gember, geleer - middel E440, voedingszuur E330, conserveermiddel E202
FAQ
Which is healthier: Melasse de sucre de canne or Gember siroop?
Overall, Gember siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gember siroop has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gember siroop has less sugar: 57.6 g versus 62 g per 100 g.