Maultaschen traditionell schwäbisch vs Pilzmaultaschen
Overall, Pilzmaultaschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Maultaschen traditionell schwäbisch
Pilzmaultaschen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maultaschen traditionell sch... | Pilzmaultaschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 184 kcal |
| Fat | 8.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Celery, Eggs, Gluten | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilzmaultaschen has 17% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pilzmaultaschen has 19% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Pilzmaultaschen has 14% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maultaschen traditionell schwäbisch has 12% more protein (9.6 g vs 8.4 g).
- Only Pilzmaultaschen lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Maultaschen traditionell schwäbisch
28% Schweinefleisch, Hartweizengrieß, Wasser, Weißbrot (Weizenmehl, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe), Spinat, Speck, Vollei, Zwiebeln, Speisesalz, Petersilie, Dextrose, Gewürze, Stabilisator: Natriumcitrate, Gewürzextrakte (Enthält Sellerie), Rapsöl.
Pilzmaultaschen
21 % Schweinefleisch, 17% Pilze (Pfifferlinge, Butterpilze, Austernseitlinge, Egerlinge, Rotkappen, Maronenröhrlinge, Steinpilze), HARTWEIZENGRIESS, Weißbrot (WEIZENMEHL, Trinkwasser, Speisesalz, Hefe), Trinkwasser, Zwiebeln, FRISCHKÄSE (Verdickungsmittel: (Carrageen, Johannisbrotkernmehl), Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure), VOLLEI, Lauch, Speck, Speisesalz, Stabilisator: (Natriumacetate, Natriumcitrate, Ascorbinsäure), Stärke, Gewürze, Maltodextrin, Dextrose, Cham - pignonkonzentrat getrocknet, Gewürzextrakte (enthält SELLERIE).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maultaschen traditionell schwäbisch or Pilzmaultaschen?
Overall, Pilzmaultaschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilzmaultaschen has fewer calories: 184 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pilzmaultaschen has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.