Maultaschen original schwäbisch vs Pilzmaultaschen
Overall, Maultaschen original schwäbisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maultaschen original schwäbi... | Pilzmaultaschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 184 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Celery, Eggs, Gluten | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maultaschen original schwäbisch has 22% less fat (6.4 g vs 8.2 g).
- Maultaschen original schwäbisch has 31% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pilzmaultaschen has 29% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Maultaschen original schwäbisch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pilzmaultaschen lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Maultaschen original schwäbisch
_Hartweizengrieß_, Trinkwasser, 14% Schweinefleisch, Weißbrot (_Weizenmehl_, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe), Spinat, Zwiebeln, _Vollei_, Speisesalz, Petersilie, Stabilisator: (Natriumacetate, Natiumcitrate, Ascorbinsäure), Dextrose, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte (mit _Sellerie_), Rapsöl.
Pilzmaultaschen
21 % Schweinefleisch, 17% Pilze (Pfifferlinge, Butterpilze, Austernseitlinge, Egerlinge, Rotkappen, Maronenröhrlinge, Steinpilze), HARTWEIZENGRIESS, Weißbrot (WEIZENMEHL, Trinkwasser, Speisesalz, Hefe), Trinkwasser, Zwiebeln, FRISCHKÄSE (Verdickungsmittel: (Carrageen, Johannisbrotkernmehl), Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure), VOLLEI, Lauch, Speck, Speisesalz, Stabilisator: (Natriumacetate, Natriumcitrate, Ascorbinsäure), Stärke, Gewürze, Maltodextrin, Dextrose, Cham - pignonkonzentrat getrocknet, Gewürzextrakte (enthält SELLERIE).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maultaschen original schwäbisch or Pilzmaultaschen?
Overall, Maultaschen original schwäbisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilzmaultaschen has fewer calories: 184 kcal versus 196 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pilzmaultaschen has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.