Comparison

Matière grasse laitière à tartiner vs Brunch - Feine Kräuter

Overall, Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMatière grasse laitière à ta...Brunch - Feine Kräuter
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 157 kcal 236 kcal
Fat 15 g 22 g
Saturated fat 11 g 14 g
Sugars 1.9 g 3.2 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.2 g
Protein 0 g 5.7 g
Additives71
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has 33% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 236 kcal).
  • Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has 32% less fat (15 g vs 22 g).
  • Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has 21% less saturated fat (11 g vs 14 g).
  • Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has 41% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Brunch - Feine Kräuter has 100% more protein (5.7 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Matière grasse laitière à tartiner

Eau, matière grasse de lait, amidon, lactose, amidon modifié, sel (0,8%), émulsifiants (E471, E476), épaississant : E466, concentré lactique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, arômes naturels, colorant : bêta-carotène, vitamines A et E,

Brunch - Feine Kräuter

71% _Rahm_, 23 % _Magermilchjoghurt_, _Milcheiweiß_, Speisesalz, Kräuter, Speisegelatine, Gewürze

FAQ

Which is healthier: Matière grasse laitière à tartiner or Brunch - Feine Kräuter?

Overall, Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Matière grasse laitière à tartiner has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons