Comparison

Martinettes Puur 60% vs Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel

Overall, Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMartinettes Puur 60%Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 538 kcal 460 kcal
Fat 36.6 g 27 g
Saturated fat 21.9 g 14 g
Sugars 36.9 g 31 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 6.7 g 1.8 g
Additives03
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has 14% fewer calories (460 kcal vs 538 kcal).
  • Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has 26% less fat (27 g vs 36.6 g).
  • Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has 36% less saturated fat (14 g vs 21.9 g).
  • Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has 16% less sugar (31 g vs 36.9 g).
  • Martinettes Puur 60% has 73% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.8 g).

Ingredients

Martinettes Puur 60%

Cacaomassa, suiker, cacaoboter, emulgator (_soja_lecithinen), natuurlijk vanillearoma,

Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel

glucose syrup, invert sugar syrup, vegetable fats (palm, coconut, rapeseed oil), chocolate (6,9%) (cocoa mass, sugar, emulsifier: soy lecithin, flavouring: natural vanilla), low-fat cocoa powder, emulsifier: soy lecithin, flavouring: vanilla, preservative: sorbic acid, salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Martinettes Puur 60% or Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel?

Overall, Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Boerinneke Marino Chocopasta puur bel has less sugar: 31 g versus 36.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons