Comparison
Marshmallow Hot Cocoa Mix vs Cacaotonic
Overall, Cacaotonic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Marshmallow Hot Cocoa Mix | Cacaotonic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 419 kcal | 357 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 71 g | 74 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cacaotonic has 15% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 419 kcal).
- Cacaotonic has 50% less fat (3.2 g vs 6.5 g).
- Cacaotonic has 69% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 4.8 g).
- Cacaotonic has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Cacaotonic lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Marshmallow Hot Cocoa Mix
Not available.
Cacaotonic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Marshmallow Hot Cocoa Mix or Cacaotonic?
Overall, Cacaotonic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacaotonic has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marshmallow Hot Cocoa Mix has less sugar: 71 g versus 74 g per 100 g.