Comparison

Goody cao vs Cacaotonic

Overall, Goody cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGoody caoCacaotonic
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 75 kcal 357 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.5 g
Sugars 10.2 g 74 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 3.8 g 3.5 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Goody cao has 79% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 357 kcal).
  • Goody cao has 44% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Goody cao has 23% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Goody cao has 86% less sugar (10.2 g vs 74 g).
  • Only Cacaotonic lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Goody cao

Azúcar, 23% cacao desgrasado en polvo, carbonato de magnesio, emulgente: lecitinas; sal, vitamina C, aroma, fumarato ferroso, sulfato de zinc, canela, vitamina B1, vitamina D3.

Cacaotonic

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Goody cao or Cacaotonic?

Overall, Goody cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Goody cao has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Goody cao has less sugar: 10.2 g versus 74 g per 100 g.

More comparisons