Mark-Klößchen vs Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK
Overall, Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mark-Klößchen | Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 226 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Weizermehl | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has 15% fewer calories (226 kcal vs 265 kcal).
- Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has 20% less fat (12 g vs 15 g).
- Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has 26% less saturated fat (5 g vs 6.8 g).
- Mark-Klößchen has 87% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has 64% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Mark-Klößchen has 28% more protein (6.9 g vs 5 g).
- Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mark-Klößchen lists: Weizermehl.
- Only Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mark-Klößchen
Paniermehl (_Weizermehl_, Hefe, Salz), Vollei, Wasser, Rindermarkfett 15%, Salz, Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze, Rinderfond, Petersilie,
Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK
Weizenmehl (33%), Wasser, Vollei (22%), Palmöl, Kartoffelstärke. Rapsöl, Salz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mark-Klößchen or Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK?
Overall, Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mehlklößchen Fertiggerichte TK has fewer calories: 226 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mark-Klößchen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.