Maple Chicken Patties vs Hähnchenkebabpfanne
Overall, Hähnchenkebabpfanne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maple Chicken Patties | Hähnchenkebabpfanne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Chicken | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 16% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 14% less fat (9 g vs 10.5 g).
- Maple Chicken Patties has 33% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Maple Chicken Patties is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Maple Chicken Patties lists: Chicken.
Ingredients
Maple Chicken Patties
Chicken, Pure Maple Syrup, Maple Extract, Sea Salt, Spices, Parsley, Crushed Red Pepper, Vinegar, Extract of Rosemary, Dried Citrus Pulp.
Hähnchenkebabpfanne
96,7% flüssig gewürztes Hähnchenkeulenfleisch (97,21% Hähnchenkeulenfleisch, Wasser, Speisesalz), Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze, Kräuter, Dextrose, Karamellzuckersirup, Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maple Chicken Patties or Hähnchenkebabpfanne?
Overall, Hähnchenkebabpfanne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hähnchenkebabpfanne has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hähnchenkebabpfanne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.