Comparison
Mandrin vs Olympus Pirtocale
Overall, Mandrin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandrin | Olympus Pirtocale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 9.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandrin has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Mandrin
Not available.
Olympus Pirtocale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandrin or Olympus Pirtocale?
Overall, Mandrin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olympus Pirtocale has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandrin has less sugar: 9 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.