Comparison
Pfefferminz vs Olympus Pirtocale
Overall, Olympus Pirtocale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pfefferminz | Olympus Pirtocale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 74 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 14.2 g | 9.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olympus Pirtocale has 39% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 74 kcal).
- Olympus Pirtocale has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Olympus Pirtocale has 30% less sugar (9.9 g vs 14.2 g).
Ingredients
Pfefferminz
Alkohol 18%, Wasser, Zucker, Pfefferminzöl, Farbstoff
Olympus Pirtocale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pfefferminz or Olympus Pirtocale?
Overall, Olympus Pirtocale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olympus Pirtocale has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olympus Pirtocale has less sugar: 9.9 g versus 14.2 g per 100 g.