Jack daniel's pomme vs Olympus Pirtocale
Overall, Olympus Pirtocale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Jack daniel's pomme | Olympus Pirtocale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 9.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olympus Pirtocale has 72% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Olympus Pirtocale has 75% less sugar (9.9 g vs 40 g).
- Olympus Pirtocale has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Jack daniel's pomme
WHISKEY
Olympus Pirtocale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jack daniel's pomme or Olympus Pirtocale?
Overall, Olympus Pirtocale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olympus Pirtocale has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olympus Pirtocale has less sugar: 9.9 g versus 40 g per 100 g.