Comparison
Mammen Danablu vs Danablu
Overall, Danablu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mammen Danablu | Danablu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 29.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 19.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 20.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Danablu has no sugar, while Mammen Danablu has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Mammen Danablu
Not available.
Danablu
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mammen Danablu or Danablu?
Overall, Danablu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Danablu has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Danablu has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.