Comparison
Danablu vs Danablu 50+
Overall, Danablu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Danablu | Danablu 50+ |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 345 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 29.5 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.1 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Danablu has no sugar, while Danablu 50+ has 0.5 g.
- Only Danablu 50+ lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Danablu
Not available.
Danablu 50+
Melk, zout, zuursel (melk), microbieel stremsel, schimmelcultuur.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Danablu or Danablu 50+?
Overall, Danablu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Danablu 50+ has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Danablu has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.