Comparison

Lulu l ourson vs Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat

Overall, Lulu l ourson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLulu l oursonTronches de cake - Moelleux...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 391 kcal 455 kcal
Fat 16 g 25 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 5.4 g
Sugars 31 g 31 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.4 g
Fiber 1.8 g 2.2 g
Protein 5.2 g 5.3 g
Additives96
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lulu l ourson has 14% fewer calories (391 kcal vs 455 kcal).
  • Lulu l ourson has 36% less fat (16 g vs 25 g).
  • Lulu l ourson has 39% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat has 56% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat has 18% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Only Lulu l ourson lists: Milk.
  • Only Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Lulu l ourson

Farine de _blé_ 23,7%, sirop de glucose-fructose, _œufs_ 12,3%, sucre, huile de colza 11,2%, chocolat noir 6,1% [pâte de cacao, sucre, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme], stabilisant (glycérol), _lait_ écrémé 3,4% et entier 2,2% en poudre (équivalent _lait_ 53%), amidon de _blé_, poudre à lever (diphosphate disodique, carbonate acide de sodium), émulsifiants (E472b, E475, lécithine de _soja_), sel, cacao maigre en poudre, arômes.

Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat

Farine de blé (26%), sucre, huile de colza non hydrogénée, œufs de poules élevées en plein air (14%), sirop de glucose-fructose, eau, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, stabilisants : glycérol et sorbitols, noisette, sirop de sucre inverti, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiants : lécithines (soja) et mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, huile de noisette, poudre à lever : carbonates d'ammonium, arômes, sel,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lulu l ourson or Tronches de cake - Moelleux Chocolat?

Overall, Lulu l ourson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lulu l ourson has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 455 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lulu l ourson has less sugar: 31 g versus 31 g per 100 g.

More comparisons