Comparison

Lulu l ourson vs Merendina

Overall, Lulu l ourson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLulu l oursonMerendina
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 391 kcal 402 kcal
Fat 16 g 19 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 11 g
Sugars 31 g 38 g
Salt 0.8 g —
Fiber 1.8 g 1.7 g
Protein 5.2 g 4.1 g
Additives94
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lulu l ourson has 16% less fat (16 g vs 19 g).
  • Lulu l ourson has 70% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 11 g).
  • Lulu l ourson has 18% less sugar (31 g vs 38 g).
  • Lulu l ourson has 21% more protein (5.2 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Only Lulu l ourson lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Lulu l ourson

Farine de _blé_ 23,7%, sirop de glucose-fructose, _œufs_ 12,3%, sucre, huile de colza 11,2%, chocolat noir 6,1% [pâte de cacao, sucre, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme], stabilisant (glycérol), _lait_ écrémé 3,4% et entier 2,2% en poudre (équivalent _lait_ 53%), amidon de _blé_, poudre à lever (diphosphate disodique, carbonate acide de sodium), émulsifiants (E472b, E475, lécithine de _soja_), sel, cacao maigre en poudre, arômes.

Merendina

farine de blé, sucre, graisse végétale, cacao maigre en poudre, farine de lactose et de lait, lactosérum en poudre, poudre à lever (carbonates d'ammonium, carbonates de sodium), sel, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lulu l ourson or Merendina?

Overall, Lulu l ourson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lulu l ourson has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lulu l ourson has less sugar: 31 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons