Comparison

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% vs Sonnenblumenmargarine

Overall, Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLooping Halbfettmargarine 39...Sonnenblumenmargarine
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 376 kcal 720 kcal
Fat 39.4 g 80 g
Saturated fat 12.1 g 24 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.2 g 0 g
Additives50
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 48% fewer calories (376 kcal vs 720 kcal).
  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 51% less fat (39.4 g vs 80 g).
  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 50% less saturated fat (12.1 g vs 24 g).
  • Sonnenblumenmargarine has no sugar, while Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 0.3 g.
  • Sonnenblumenmargarine has 60% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39%

Halbfettmargarine 39% Zutaten : Wasser, pflanzliche Öle und Fette (Raps Palm, in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), modifziete Stärke, Emulgator (E471, Magermilchpulver, Salz (0,5 %) Konservierungsstoff (E202), Aroma, Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure, Milchsäure ), Farbstoff (Carotine), Vitamine (Vitamin D), Gesamtfettgehalt : 39 %,

Sonnenblumenmargarine

9-00 D 337256 382540

FAQ

Which is healthier: Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% or Sonnenblumenmargarine?

Overall, Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 720 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sonnenblumenmargarine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons