Loading… vs House Blend Lungo
Overall, House Blend Lungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Loading…
House Blend Lungo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Loading… | House Blend Lungo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 20.2 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- House Blend Lungo has 64% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 92 kcal).
- House Blend Lungo has 86% less fat (1.1 g vs 7.9 g).
- House Blend Lungo has 79% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- House Blend Lungo has 88% more protein (5.6 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Loading… lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Loading…
_Fish_ Body Oil, Capsule Shell (Beef Gelatin, Glycerol), Antioxidant (Tocopherol)
House Blend Lungo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Loading… or House Blend Lungo?
Overall, House Blend Lungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
House Blend Lungo has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 92 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
House Blend Lungo has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.