Light-Chips - Classic vs Chips light
Overall, Light-Chips - Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Light-Chips - Classic | Chips light |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 474 kcal | 481 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 22.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Light-Chips - Classic has 85% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 12 g).
- Chips light has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Chips light has 23% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Light-Chips - Classic has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Light-Chips - Classic
Kartoffeln, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Dextrose, Speisesalz, Zwiebelpulver, Zucker, schwarzer Pfeffer, natürliches Aroma, Antioxidationsmittel: stark tocopherolhaltige Extrakte. Kann Milch enthalten.
Chips light
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Light-Chips - Classic or Chips light?
Overall, Light-Chips - Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Light-Chips - Classic has fewer calories: 474 kcal versus 481 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips light has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.