Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips vs Chips light
Overall, Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips
Chips light
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy C... | Chips light |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 533 kcal | 481 kcal |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 22.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | — |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips light has 32% less fat (22.7 g vs 33.3 g).
- Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has 72% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 12 g).
- Chips light has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has no salt, while Chips light has 1 g.
- Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has 80% more protein (33.3 g vs 6.8 g).
- Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips
Antibiotic-Free Chicken, Native Tapioca Starch, High Oleic Expeller Pressed Sunflower Oil, Egg Whites, Chicken Bone Broth, Aged Cayenne Pepper Sauce, Vinegar, Paprika Extract, Sea Salt, Spices, Citric Acid, Maltodextrin, Yeast Extract, Natural Flavors, Salt, Sodium Citrate, Sugar, Gum Acacia.
Chips light
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips or Chips light?
Overall, Wilde Buffalo Style Crispy Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips light has fewer calories: 481 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips light has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.