Light boter vs Cuisson Pratique
Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Light boter | Cuisson Pratique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 226 kcal | 620 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 70 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Light boter has 64% fewer calories (226 kcal vs 620 kcal).
- Light boter has 64% less fat (25 g vs 70 g).
- Light boter has 33% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 6.7 g).
- Light boter has 77% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Light boter has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Light boter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cuisson Pratique lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Light boter
Not available.
Cuisson Pratique
Huiles végétales 79% (colza en l'état et totalement hydrogénée, tournesol), eau, sel 1,5%, émulsifiants: lécithines (dont SOJA), arôme, acidifiant: acide citrique, colorant: caroténoïdes, vitamine D.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Light boter or Cuisson Pratique?
Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Light boter has fewer calories: 226 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Light boter has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.