Comparison
Leerdammer light life vs Leerdammer
Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leerdammer light life | Leerdammer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 271 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 27.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.5 g | 18.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 29.5 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leerdammer light life has 23% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 352 kcal).
- Leerdammer light life has 38% less fat (17 g vs 27.5 g).
- Leerdammer light life has 38% less saturated fat (11.5 g vs 18.5 g).
- Leerdammer light life has 12% more protein (29.5 g vs 26 g).
Ingredients
Leerdammer light life
Not available.
Leerdammer
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leerdammer light life or Leerdammer?
Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer light life has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leerdammer light life has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Leerdammer original vs Leerdammer light life
Leerdammer original 20 t... vs Leerdammer
Leerdammer light life vs Leerdammer original 20 t...
Leerdammer Original vs Leerdammer light life
Leerdammer vs Leerdammer
Leerdammer light life vs Feine Scheiben Protein
Leerdammer light life vs Leerdammer
Leerdammer original vs Leerdammer