Comparison

Leerdammer Original vs Leerdammer light life

Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLeerdammer OriginalLeerdammer light life
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 352 kcal 271 kcal
Fat 27.5 g 17 g
Saturated fat 18.5 g 11.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.1 g
Salt 1.5 g —
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 26 g 29.5 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Leerdammer light life has 23% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Leerdammer light life has 38% less fat (17 g vs 27.5 g).
  • Leerdammer light life has 38% less saturated fat (11.5 g vs 18.5 g).
  • Leerdammer light life has 12% more protein (29.5 g vs 26 g).
  • Only Leerdammer Original lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Leerdammer Original

Melk, zout, zuursel (bevat melk), vegetarisch stremsel.

Leerdammer light life

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Leerdammer Original or Leerdammer light life?

Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Leerdammer light life has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Leerdammer Original has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons