Leerdammer original vs Leerdammer light life
Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leerdammer original | Leerdammer light life |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Fat | 27.5 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.5 g | 11.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 27 g | 29.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leerdammer light life has 24% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Leerdammer light life has 38% less fat (17 g vs 27.5 g).
- Leerdammer light life has 38% less saturated fat (11.5 g vs 18.5 g).
- Only Leerdammer original lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Leerdammer original
LAIT, sel, ferments LACTIQUES, enzyme coagulante microbienne, dans la croûte : conservateur : natamycine,
Leerdammer light life
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leerdammer original or Leerdammer light life?
Overall, Leerdammer light life has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer light life has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leerdammer original has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.