Leerdammer vs Leerdammer
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leerdammer | Leerdammer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 27.5 g | 27.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.5 g | 18.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Leerdammer
8 LEERDAMMER ORIGINAL DOUX & FRUITE MILD & NOOTACHTIG MILD & NUSSIG R Lait de pâturage¹/ Weidemelk Weidemilch ✔ Ingrédients naturels/ Natuurlijke ingrediënten/ Natürliche Zutaten 225ge 76052011 Emballage refermable / Hersluitbare verpakking / Wiederverschliessbar Suggestion de présentation / Serveertip / Serviervorschlag 76051751 50037906 2.99
Leerdammer
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leerdammer or Leerdammer?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leerdammer has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.