Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% vs Nestea forest fruits
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% | Nestea forest fruits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest fruits has 69% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 62 kcal).
- Nestea forest fruits has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Nestea forest fruits has no saturated fat, while Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% has 2.4 g.
- Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% has 83% more protein (3 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5%
Not available.
Nestea forest fruits
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% or Nestea forest fruits?
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea forest fruits has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 62 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lapte Poiana florilor 3,5% has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.